Month: April 2026

FAQ: Compliance Questions Every Fintech Founder Should Ask

Posted on by admin

Regulatory and Licensing Questions

Q1: Which compliance frameworks apply to my fintech? 

It depends on what your company does. If you process, store, or transmit payment card data – PCI DSS. If you operate as a payment aggregator or payment gateway – RBI PA/PG guidelines. If you handle personal data of Indian citizens – DPDP Act. If your clients are SEBI-regulated entities – their CSCRF requirements flow down to you as a vendor. If you serve US or EU enterprise clients – they will likely require SOC 2. Start by mapping your data flows and identifying which regulatory bodies have jurisdiction over your operations.

Q2: Do I need RBI approval to operate as a payment aggregator? 

Yes. Following the RBI’s guidelines on PA/PG regulation, payment aggregators must obtain authorization from RBI. This involves meeting net worth requirements, implementing security controls, establishing a grievance redressal mechanism, and maintaining a designated nodal officer. The application process can take 12-18 months, and operating without authorization exposes your company to regulatory action.

Q3: At what stage should I start thinking about compliance? 

From day one of handling sensitive data. The common mistake is treating compliance as a later-stage activity. Building compliance into your architecture and processes from the start is significantly cheaper than retrofitting later. At minimum, implement encryption, access controls, and logging from your first production deployment.

Security and Data Protection Questions

Q4: We are a small team. Do we really need a formal security program? 

Yes. The size of your team does not change the regulatory requirements or the risk. What changes is the scale of implementation. A 10-person fintech does not need a 50-page security policy manual. But it does need documented access controls, encryption for sensitive data, regular vulnerability scans, incident response procedures, and security awareness training for every team member. Regulators and enterprise clients will ask for evidence of these controls regardless of your company size.

Q5: How do we handle data localization requirements in India? 

RBI mandates that payment data related to Indian transactions must be stored in India. This includes the full end-to-end transaction data, not just a copy. If you use cloud infrastructure, ensure your data residency settings restrict payment data to Indian regions. For DPDP compliance, the rules specify conditions for cross-border transfer of personal data, with certain countries approved and others requiring additional safeguards.

Q6: What is the minimum security testing we should be doing? 

At minimum – quarterly vulnerability scans of your external-facing systems and an annual penetration test. If you handle payment card data, PCI DSS mandates both. Beyond the minimum, implement SAST and DAST in your development pipeline, conduct security code reviews for critical components, and perform a penetration test before every major release. For early-stage companies, a focused penetration test of your core product is more valuable than a broad but shallow scan.

Certification and Audit Questions

Q7: What is the difference between PCI DSS SAQ and ROC? 

A Self-Assessment Questionnaire is a self-validation tool for merchants and service providers with lower transaction volumes or simpler environments. A Report on Compliance is a detailed assessment conducted by a Qualified Security Assessor. Which one you need depends on your transaction volume, processing model, and what your acquiring bank requires. Service providers processing over 300,000 transactions annually typically need an ROC.

Q8: How long does it take to get PCI DSS certified? 

For a first-time certification with no existing controls, expect 6-12 months including gap assessment, remediation, and the formal assessment. If your organization already has mature security controls, the timeline can be shorter. The assessment itself typically takes 4-8 weeks of active engagement, but the preparation is where most of the time is spent.

Q9: Can we pursue multiple certifications simultaneously? 

Yes, and it is often more efficient. PCI DSS, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 share approximately 60% of their control requirements. An integrated compliance approach lets you implement controls once and map them across multiple frameworks, reducing the total effort. Plan your certification roadmap based on which framework your most important client or regulatory body requires first.

Q10: How much should we budget for compliance in our first year? 

A useful benchmark is 5-10% of your IT budget for compliance activities in the first year, decreasing as controls mature. This includes assessment fees, tooling, any external consulting, and internal staff time. For a seed-stage fintech, this might be 10-15 lakhs for an initial PCI DSS SAQ and basic security testing. For a Series A company pursuing PCI DSS ROC and SOC 2, budget 30-50 lakhs including both assessments.

Operational and Growth Questions

Q11: How do we handle compliance when we are iterating quickly? 

Build compliance checkpoints into your development process rather than treating it as a separate activity. Include security requirements in your user stories. Implement automated security testing in your CI/CD pipeline. Require security review for changes that affect the cardholder data environment or personal data processing. The goal is compliance as code, not compliance as a project.

Q12: Our client is asking for a compliance certificate we have never heard of. What do we do? 

First, understand what the certificate actually assesses. Search for the standard name plus the issuing body. Then determine whether the requirement is coming from a regulatory mandate, an industry standard, or the client’s internal policy. If it is the client’s internal policy, you may be able to satisfy their requirement with an existing certification plus supplementary evidence. If it is a regulatory mandate, engage a qualified assessor who specializes in that framework.

Q13: Should we hire a CISO or outsource security leadership?

For companies under 100 employees, a virtual CISO or fractional CISO arrangement is typically more cost-effective and provides access to more experienced professionals than you could afford full-time. As your company grows and your compliance obligations expand, transition to a full-time CISO. The inflection point is usually when you are managing three or more compliance frameworks simultaneously.

Q14: How do I explain compliance costs to my investors? 

Frame compliance as a market access enabler, not a cost center. Every enterprise client you win requires compliance certifications. Quantify the revenue attached to deals that require PCI DSS or SOC 2. Show the timeline – investing in compliance now accelerates your sales cycle for the next 12-24 months of enterprise deals.

Q: What is the first compliance certification a fintech should pursue?

A: Start with the certification your most important client or regulator requires. For payment companies, this is typically PCI DSS. For SaaS companies selling to US enterprise clients, SOC 2.

Q: Can a startup pass a PCI DSS audit?

A: Yes. PCI DSS does not have a minimum company size. Many startups achieve compliance through SAQ validation. The key is implementing the required controls, not having a large compliance team.

QRC works with fintech companies at every stage – from first compliance certification to multi-framework programs. Contact us to build your compliance roadmap.

SEBI CSCRF 2026: Building Your SOC From Compliance Mandate

Posted on by admin
SEBI’s Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework has moved from advisory guidance to mandatory compliance for regulated entities. The framework covers stock brokers, depository participants, mutual fund houses, asset management companies, registrars, and other market intermediaries. At its core, CSCRF requires regulated entities to establish comprehensive cybersecurity governance, implement technical controls, maintain a Security Operations Center capability, conduct regular audits, and report cyber incidents to SEBI within specified timelines. The SOC requirement is where most mid-size regulated entities face their biggest implementation challenge. SEBI does not prescribe whether you must build an in-house SOC or contract a managed SOC provider, but it does require that you have continuous monitoring capabilities, incident detection and response processes, and documented escalation procedures. For organizations classified as high-category regulated entities based on their client count, transaction volume, and asset base, the expectations are more stringent, including 24×7 monitoring capabilities and dedicated security personnel. The deadline pressure is real — SEBI has begun including CSCRF compliance in its inspection framework, and non-compliance findings can result in regulatory action.
Three SOC Models and Which One Fits Your Organization
The first option is an in-house SOC — building your own team, infrastructure, and processes. This gives you maximum control but requires significant investment in people, technology, and ongoing operations. For most mid-size regulated entities, this is prohibitively expensive. A fully staffed 24×7 SOC requires minimum 8-12 security analysts, a SIEM platform, threat intelligence feeds, incident response tooling, and continuous training. Annual costs typically start at 2-3 crore. The second option is a fully managed SOC from a third-party provider. You outsource the monitoring, detection, and initial response functions to a specialized vendor. This is the most cost-effective approach for organizations without existing security operations capabilities. The critical factor is choosing a provider who understands SEBI CSCRF requirements specifically, not just general cybersecurity monitoring. Your managed SOC provider must be able to support SEBI’s incident reporting timelines and provide compliance-ready reporting. The third option is a hybrid SOC — you maintain a small internal security team that handles governance, compliance reporting, and strategic security decisions, while a managed SOC provider handles day-to-day monitoring and detection. This is increasingly the preferred model for mid-to-large regulated entities because it balances cost efficiency with organizational control over compliance reporting.
Mapping SOC Operations to CSCRF Requirements
CSCRF organizes its requirements across several domains, and your SOC operations must address multiple domains simultaneously. For the Identify domain, your SOC must maintain an updated asset inventory and understand the critical information assets within your environment. This feeds directly into detection rule configuration — you cannot detect attacks against systems you do not know exist. For the Protect domain, your SOC must monitor security controls effectiveness and flag configuration drift. This includes monitoring for unauthorized changes to firewall rules, access control configurations, and endpoint protection status. For the Detect domain, this is the SOC’s primary function — continuous monitoring of security events, correlation of logs from multiple sources, detection of anomalous behavior, and identification of potential security incidents. SEBI expects that your detection capabilities cover network intrusion, malware, unauthorized access, data exfiltration, and insider threat scenarios. For the Respond domain, your SOC must have documented incident response procedures aligned with SEBI’s reporting requirements. Cyber incidents must be reported to SEBI and CERT-In within 6 hours of detection, which means your SOC must have clear escalation paths and pre-approved incident classification criteria. For the Recover domain, your SOC must support business continuity and disaster recovery processes, including post-incident analysis and lessons learned.
Implementation Roadmap for CSCRF SOC Compliance
Phase one is assessment and planning — 4-6 weeks. Conduct a gap analysis of your current cybersecurity capabilities against CSCRF requirements. Identify which SOC model fits your organization’s size, budget, and risk profile. Document your critical assets, data flows, and existing security controls. This phase produces your CSCRF compliance roadmap. Phase two is SOC setup — 8-12 weeks. If building in-house or hybrid, procure and configure your SIEM platform, deploy log collectors across your infrastructure, and begin onboarding log sources. If using a managed SOC, complete vendor selection, negotiate SLAs aligned with SEBI requirements, and begin the integration process. Critical log sources include firewalls, intrusion detection systems, endpoint protection, active directory, application servers, and database audit logs. Phase three is policy and process development — concurrent with phase two. Develop your incident response plan with SEBI-specific reporting procedures, create escalation matrices, define incident classification criteria, and document your SOC operating procedures. These documents will be reviewed during your CSCRF compliance audit. Phase four is testing and validation — 4 weeks. Conduct tabletop exercises simulating different cyber incident scenarios. Test your incident reporting workflow end-to-end, including SEBI portal submission. Validate that your detection rules are generating alerts for known attack patterns. Run a simulated audit to identify documentation gaps before the actual compliance assessment.
Common Compliance Pitfalls to Avoid
The first pitfall is treating CSCRF as a one-time project rather than an ongoing program. SEBI expects continuous compliance, not point-in-time certification. Your SOC must demonstrate operational effectiveness over time through consistent monitoring, regular incident drills, and periodic control reviews. The second pitfall is inadequate log coverage. We frequently find regulated entities that have deployed a SIEM but only onboarded a fraction of their critical log sources. If your trading platform generates logs that are not being ingested by your SOC, you have a detection gap that will surface during an audit. The third pitfall is poor vendor management when using a managed SOC. Your compliance obligation does not transfer to the vendor — it remains yours. Ensure your managed SOC contract includes SEBI-specific SLAs, compliance reporting formats, incident escalation timelines, and the right to audit the provider’s operations. The fourth pitfall is insufficient skilled personnel. Even with a managed SOC, SEBI expects the regulated entity to have designated personnel responsible for cybersecurity governance. This typically means a CISO or equivalent role, even if filled part-time in smaller organizations. Document the roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines for cybersecurity governance within your organization.
Q: Is a SOC mandatory under SEBI CSCRF?
A: SEBI requires continuous monitoring capabilities, which effectively mandates SOC functionality. Whether you build in-house, use managed services, or adopt a hybrid model is your choice.
Q: What is the incident reporting timeline under SEBI CSCRF?
A: Cyber incidents must be reported to SEBI and CERT-In within 6 hours of detection. Your SOC must have processes to support this timeline.
Q: Can a managed SOC provider handle SEBI compliance reporting?
A: A managed SOC can support compliance, but the regulated entity retains accountability. Ensure your provider understands SEBI-specific reporting requirements and include them in your SLA.
QRC helps SEBI-regulated entities implement CSCRF-compliant cybersecurity programs. Contact us for a gap assessment and implementation roadmap.

What’s New in PCI Secure Software Standard v2.0

Posted on by admin

The PCI Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) released version 2.0 of the PCI Secure Software Standard in January 2026, marking a major revision from the previous v1.2.1. If your organization develops, assesses, or relies on payment software, this update carries significant implications. Here’s a breakdown of what’s changed and what you need to know.

A Major Revision – Not A Minor Update

First and foremost, the PCI SSC has emphasized that this is a major revision. Unlike incremental updates, there is no definitive one-to-one mapping between v1.2.1 and v2.0. Organizations should approach this as a significant rethink of the standard’s structure, language, and scope – not simply an updated checklist.

Key Terminology Changes

One of the most immediately noticeable shifts is the language used throughout the standard. The term “Payment Software” has been removed entirely. In its place, the standard now revolves around the concept of “Sensitive Assets.” This broader framing better captures the range of data, resources, and functionality that software must protect. Several related glossary terms have also been updated:

  • “Critical Asset” is now “Sensitive Asset” (and has been rewritten)
  • “Sensitive Function” is now “Sensitive Functionality” (and has been rewritten)
  • “Sensitive Data” and “Sensitive Resource” definitions have both been revised
  • A new term, “Strong Authentication,” has been introduced

The glossary itself has been moved in-house: v2.0 includes a new Appendix A that supersedes the previously external SSF Glossary document, making all defined terms available within the standard itself. Additionally, “Control Objectives” have been renamed “Security Objectives” throughout the document.

New Companion Document: Sensitive Asset Identification

A brand-new external companion document has been introduced alongside v2.0 – the Sensitive Asset Identification document. This is not optional reading: it is a mandatory companion to the standard and forms part of its program.

The document provides additional context and examples for understanding Sensitive Assets, Sensitive Data, Sensitive Functionality, and Sensitive Resources. For vendors working with EMVCo 3DS-related data, the standard also relies on the PCI 3DS Data Matrix document.

Restructured Test Requirements And Methodology

All test requirements have been essentially rewritten in v2.0. The new approach is structured around three core methods:

  1. Documentation Review
  2. Static Analysis
  3. Dynamic Analysis

Additional new sections include Software Testing, Provision of Source Code, Technical Constraints, and Technical FAQs – the last of which mirrors language from existing PCI Technical FAQ documents.

Overhauled Core Requirements

The core section has been retitled “Core – All Software” to emphasize that these requirements apply universally to all software assessed under the standard. The eleven Security Objectives now cover:

  • Security Objective 1: Software Architecture, Composition, and Versioning – including requirements for Bill of Materials (BOM), versioning practices, and the use of wildcards.
  • Security Objective 2: Sensitive Asset Identification – relies on the new companion document covers identifying Sensitive Data, Sensitive Resources, Sensitive Functionality, and Sensitive Modes of Operation.
  • Security Objective 3: Sensitive Asset Storage and Retention
  • Security Objective 4: Sensitive Modes of Operation – applies only when a Sensitive Mode of Operation is present introduces “Strong Authentication.”
  • Security Objective 5: Sensitive Asset Protection – including the software design itself as a sensitive asset, and formalizing the concept of “anomalous behavior.”
  • Security Objective 6: Sensitive Asset Output – formalizes secure channel requirements.
  • Security Objective 7: Random Numbers – covers both leveraging an external RNG and implementing one within the software.
  • Security Objective 8: Key Management
  • Security Objective 9: Cryptography (a single encompassing requirement for cases not covered elsewhere)
  • Security Objective 10: Threats and Vulnerabilities
  • Security Objective 11: Secure Deployment and Management – includes implementation guidance and software versioning.

 

Changes To Modules : Modules are additional requirements that apply on top of the Core – All Software section, based on defined criteria.

  • Module A (Account Data Protection): Requirements have been revised to focus specifically on PAN and SAD in relation to PCI DSS.
  • Module B (formerly Terminal Software Requirements, now POI Device Software): The module has been retitled and its requirements refined and reduced. Several requirements previously in Module B have been absorbed into the Core – All Software section. SRED requirements have also been revised.
  • Module C (formerly Web Software Requirements, now Publicly-accessible Software): The module has been retitled to better reflect its intent. Several requirements from the old C.1 section have been moved to the Core section. Requirements C.1.5 and C.1.6 have been removed, as they are now covered by the PCI Secure SLC Standard.
  • Module D (NEW – Software Development Kits): This is an entirely new module. v2.0 is now better suited to accommodate the assessment of SDKs, including EMVCo 3DS SDKs. Module D introduces a new set of objectives and requirements specifically for this category.

Structural And Administrative Changes

Several structural changes have been made to align v2.0 more closely with the broader PCI Standards framework:

  • A new “Sensitive Assets” section has been added to the introduction.
  • The “Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities” section has been removed from the standard and relocated to the PCI Secure Software Program Guide.
  • The “Scope of Security Requirements” section has been removed entirely.
  • Related Publications have been moved to a new Appendix B.
  • A new Appendix C covers Technical References.
  • SLC-related requirements have been removed from this standard, as they are now covered under the PCI Secure SLC Standard.
  • The standard now relies on “Strong Cryptography” as the baseline for cryptographic requirements, replacing the previous “Effective Key Strength” framework.

What This Means For Your Organization

Whether you are a software vendor seeking or maintaining certification, an assessor reviewing compliance, or a payment brand evaluating software, v2.0 represents a meaningful shift. The expanded focus on Sensitive Assets (rather than Payment Software alone) broadens the standard’s applicability. The introduction of Module D makes it relevant to SDK developers for the first time. And the comprehensive rewrite of test requirements means existing assessment processes will need to be revisited.

Organizations currently certified or in the process of certification under v1.2.1 should review the full v2.0 standard and the new Sensitive Asset Identification companion document to understand how requirements map (or don’t map) to their current implementations.

The PCI SSC has made clear that this version is designed to be more structured, more broadly applicable, and better aligned with the evolving software security landscape – including the growing role of SDKs, third-party components, and complex software supply chains.

For the full standard and companion documents, visit the PCI Security Standards Council website at PCIsecuritystandards.org.

Need Help Navigating PCI Secure Software Standard V2.0?

At QRC Assurance and Solutions, we understand that major standard revisions can be complex to interpret and even more challenging to implement. Whether you are a software vendor preparing for assessment under v2.0, an organization reviewing your current certification status, or a development team working through the new Sensitive Asset framework for the first time – our team of qualified security experts is here to guide you every step of the way.

Our services include:

  • Gap assessments against PCI Secure Software Standard v2.0
  • Pre-assessment readiness reviews
  • Support for Module D (SDK) assessments – new to v2.0
  • Guidance on the mandatory Sensitive Asset Identification companion document
  • End-to-end PCI SSF assessment and certification support

Don’t let a major revision catch your organization off guard. Get ahead of the changes with expert support from a team that lives and breathes payment security compliance. Contact us today to schedule a consultation or learn more about how QRC Assurance and Solutions can help you achieve and maintain compliance with confidence.

Visit us at: www.qrcsolutionz.com | Email us at: connect@qrcsolutionz.com

SOC 2 for Indian Fintech: Why Global Clients Are Asking

Posted on by admin
If you run an Indian SaaS or fintech company selling to enterprise clients in the US, UK, or EU, you have probably encountered the SOC 2 question during a procurement cycle. It usually surfaces in the security questionnaire or during vendor risk assessment — the client’s security team asks for your latest SOC 2 Type II report, and if you do not have one, the deal stalls or gets complicated with alternative evidence requirements. This is not an arbitrary hurdle. SOC 2 has become the default trust signal for technology service providers in North American and European markets. Enterprise buyers use it as a baseline assurance that your organization has implemented controls around security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. Without it, their vendor risk management frameworks flag your organization as higher risk, which means additional scrutiny, longer procurement cycles, and sometimes deal-killing escalations. For Indian fintech companies processing payment data, handling personal information, or providing infrastructure services to global clients, the absence of a SOC 2 report is increasingly a competitive disadvantage rather than just a nice-to-have.
SOC 2 vs ISO 27001: Understanding the Difference
Many Indian organizations already hold ISO 27001 certification and assume it serves the same purpose as SOC 2. While there is significant overlap in the underlying controls, they serve different audiences and different purposes. ISO 27001 certifies that your information security management system meets the standard’s requirements at a point in time. It is widely recognized globally and particularly valued in Asian, European, and Middle Eastern markets. SOC 2 provides an independent auditor’s opinion on whether your controls operated effectively over a defined period — typically 6 to 12 months. The Type II report includes detailed testing results showing how controls performed over time, not just whether they existed. North American enterprise buyers prefer SOC 2 because the Type II report gives them evidence of operational effectiveness over a sustained period. ISO 27001 tells them your ISMS is properly designed SOC 2 Type II tells them it actually works over time. The practical recommendation for Indian companies selling globally is to maintain both. ISO 27001 for markets and clients that value it, and SOC 2 Type II for US and European enterprise clients. The control overlap means maintaining both is more efficient than building each from scratch — approximately 60-70% of controls map across frameworks.
The Five Trust Services Criteria Explained
SOC 2 is organized around five trust services criteria, and you choose which ones apply to your service. Security is mandatory — every SOC 2 report must include it. The other four are optional and selected based on your service commitments. Security covers protection of information and systems against unauthorized access, both physical and logical. This includes access controls, network security, change management, risk assessment, and monitoring. If your service handles client data in any form, security is your baseline. Availability applies if your service commitments include uptime guarantees or SLAs. It covers system monitoring, disaster recovery, business continuity, and incident response. If your clients rely on your platform being accessible, include availability. Processing Integrity applies if your service performs processing that must be complete, valid, accurate, and timely. For fintech companies processing transactions, this is almost always relevant. Confidentiality covers data designated as confidential — trade secrets, business plans, intellectual property. If your service handles client data that is classified as confidential beyond general personal data, include this. Privacy applies when your service collects, uses, retains, or disposes of personal information. For companies handling end-user personal data on behalf of clients, privacy is relevant. Most Indian fintech and SaaS companies include security and availability at minimum, with processing integrity added if they handle transactions.
What the SOC 2 Journey Looks Like for an Indian Company
The typical SOC 2 engagement for an Indian fintech company spans 8-14 months from start to Type II report. The first phase is readiness — 2-4 months of gap assessment, control design, policy documentation, and implementation. This is where you map your existing controls to the trust services criteria, identify gaps, and implement missing controls. If you already have ISO 27001, this phase is significantly shorter because many controls are already in place. The second phase is the observation period — minimum 3 months for your first Type II report, though 6 months is more common and preferred by enterprise clients. During this period, your controls must be operational and generating evidence. This is not a passive period — you need to actively collect evidence of control operation, conduct access reviews, perform vulnerability scans, run tabletop exercises, and maintain your monitoring. The third phase is the audit itself — 4-6 weeks of fieldwork where the auditor tests your controls against the trust services criteria. They review your policies, test a sample of control activities from the observation period, and evaluate any exceptions or deviations. The report is then issued with an opinion on whether your controls operated effectively. Cost varies significantly based on scope and complexity, but Indian companies should budget between 15-30 lakhs for the first year including readiness and audit, with subsequent annual audits costing less as the program matures.
Practical Tips for Getting Started
Begin with a scope definition exercise. Identify which systems, processes, and people support the service you deliver to clients. This becomes your system description in the SOC 2 report. A common mistake is scoping too broadly — include only what directly supports the in-scope service. Leverage your existing ISO 27001 controls. Map your ISMS controls to the SOC 2 trust services criteria and identify gaps. Focus your effort on the gaps rather than rebuilding from scratch. The most common gaps for ISO 27001-certified organizations are in evidence collection, monitoring automation, and vendor management documentation. Invest in evidence collection automation early. SOC 2 Type II requires evidence of control operation over the entire observation period. Manually collecting this evidence is unsustainable. Implement tools that automatically capture access review completions, vulnerability scan results, change management approvals, and incident response activities. Choose your auditor carefully. Ensure they are a licensed CPA firm with experience auditing technology companies. Ask for references from similar Indian companies and verify their understanding of the distributed development and operations models common in Indian tech organizations. Finally, communicate the timeline and value to your sales team. A SOC 2 engagement that was initiated because of client demand should be visible to the commercial team so they can set expectations with prospects and use the in-progress engagement as evidence of commitment to security.
Q: How long does it take to get SOC 2 Type II certified?
A: The typical timeline is 8-14 months from initiation to receiving your Type II report, including 2-4 months of readiness and a minimum 3-6 month observation period.
Q: Do we need SOC 2 if we already have ISO 27001?
A: ISO 27001 and SOC 2 serve different audiences. If your clients are primarily in North America or Europe, they will likely require SOC 2 Type II regardless of your ISO 27001 certification.
Q: What does SOC 2 compliance cost in India?
A: Budget 15-30 lakhs for the first year including readiness assessment and audit. Annual renewal audits typically cost 30-50% less as your program matures.
QRC provides SOC 2 readiness assessments and audit services for Indian technology companies. Contact us to understand your path to SOC 2 Type II.